A recent BMJ article critiques the stove industry’s engagement with government over proposals that could have restricted wood-burning stoves in new homes, and it frames the industry as having behaved improperly by lobbying. We believe that framing is unfair, as this is not about shutting down debate or avoiding accountability. It is about making sure decisions are based on solid evidence and a clear understanding of how modern appliances differ from older forms of burning.
At Charnwood, we believe cleaner air and resilient homes can go hand in hand. Continued advancements in stove technology, responsible fuel use and the replacement of older appliances offer a practical way forward, while modern stoves can provide dependable secondary heat during power cuts or periods of energy uncertainty. We’re not making a case for wood burning to be exempt from scrutiny, but for modern stoves to be judged fairly on the evidence and their real world performance.
Accuracy is not silence
The BMJ article criticises the Stove Industry Association’s engagement with the Scottish Government and UK departments. However, speaking with policymakers is a normal and necessary part of democratic decision making, particularly when proposed rules could affect households and the businesses that support them.
Engagement does not mean opposing cleaner air. It means asking for policy that targets the highest emitting forms of burning while recognising the progress made in modern stove technology. When councils, campaigners or media reports use “wood burning” as a catch all term, they risk confusing the public and directing attention away from where the greatest improvements can be made.
Not all wood burning is the same 
Air quality absolutely matters, and the stove industry will continue to play its part in improving it. A first step is recognising that open fires, older appliances and modern Ecodesign compliant stoves are not the same. Modern stoves are designed to burn dry wood much more efficiently and with substantially lower particulate emissions (up to 90% less) than the technologies they replace, while delivering far more useful heat into the home.
Recognising that difference is not an attempt to avoid regulation but is essential to developing fair, evidence led policy. If the goal is cleaner air, the most effective route is to replace the worst forms of burning with the best available technology, while continuing to improve fuel quality and household burning practice.
Read our essential stove tips here
The latest data shows progress
The BMJ article quotes Defra figures showing that PM2.5 emissions attributed to wood fuel are higher than 20 years ago. That statistic needs context.
Over that same broad period, stove technology has changed significantly and the recent direction of travel is important. UK Government emissions reporting shows that total PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from domestic combustion fell by 26% between 2018 and 2024. This coincides with the introduction of Ecodesign requirements for solid fuel room heaters from January 2022 and improved fuel standards, including restrictions on the sale of wet wood in England.
The latest figures suggest that policies focused on better appliances and drier fuel are helping to move particulate emissions in the right direction. So surely the sensible approach is to build on that progress, not ignore it.
Why new homes still need resilient heat
The BMJ article reports industry warnings that a ban could harm the economy, lead to redundancies and worsen fuel poverty. Those concerns are very real and all matter, but resilience is another important part of the discussion that is often overlooked. Modern wood-burning stoves give households a dependable secondary source of heat, particularly in rural and off-grid areas, as the SIA highlighted in its response.
New homes are increasingly designed around electricity and heat pumps, supported by tighter building standards. These are an important part of the future, but they remain vulnerable to power cuts, rising prices and pressure on the wider energy system. A modern stove gives households another option, allowing them to heat the room they are using and stay warm when other systems are under strain. At a time of global uncertainty, removing a reliable source of heat from new homes would reduce both choice and resilience.
Health, wellbeing and the life of the home
The debate around wood burning is often reduced to emissions alone. Emissions matter, and we spend a great deal of time improving them. But a home is more than just the technology that heats it. They are places where people gather, rest and live.
As Mike Parrott reflected in our recent Charnwood interview, the hearth has long been more than a source of heat. It gives a room a centre. It draws people together. It makes warmth visible and shared. That does not mean ignoring air quality. It means recognising that policy should consider the whole picture, including cleaner technology, household resilience, rural life, affordability and wellbeing.
A better path forward
We support sensible, evidence based measures that improve air quality. The practical route is to replace open fires and older appliances with modern Ecodesign stoves, use dry certified fuel, support good burning practice and enforce existing rules fairly, while continuing to improve appliance technology. This protects air quality without losing the unique benefits modern wood burning brings to households.










